<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I hate the word, not the concept, of hyperlocal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonkristufek.com/2008/02/12/why-i-hate-the-word-not-the-concept-of-hyperlocal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonkristufek.com/2008/02/12/why-i-hate-the-word-not-the-concept-of-hyperlocal/</link>
	<description>Content Strategy, Audience, Media, Ideas and New Business Model for News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 04:38:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nez</title>
		<link>http://jasonkristufek.com/2008/02/12/why-i-hate-the-word-not-the-concept-of-hyperlocal/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Nez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wemediaguru.com/?p=27#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Two things come to mind:
1) I agree with the argument for &quot;local&quot; rather than &quot;hyperlocal.&quot; Realize that we&#039;re in a cultural shift from newspapers-as-conduits-to-the-world to news-organizations-fighting-for-relevance.
The term &quot;hyperlocal&quot; signals to old-timey journos that they&#039;ve got to shift gears and start thinking about what readers want from their local news.
2) Putting little Johnny in the newspaper takes way too much time. I sit right next to this poor copy editor who laboriously formats calendar entries, obits, etc. to go in the paper for at least 30 hours per week.
There&#039;s no reason this kind of thing can&#039;t be automated. Then we free up brain cells for local reporting and good design on stuff that matters and what makes a newspaper company more credible than a community newsletter.
I&#039;ll be the first to admit that our current strategy is no strategy. But I&#039;m about to bust a blood vessel from the strain of pulling in the other direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things come to mind:<br />
1) I agree with the argument for &#8220;local&#8221; rather than &#8220;hyperlocal.&#8221; Realize that we&#8217;re in a cultural shift from newspapers-as-conduits-to-the-world to news-organizations-fighting-for-relevance.<br />
The term &#8220;hyperlocal&#8221; signals to old-timey journos that they&#8217;ve got to shift gears and start thinking about what readers want from their local news.<br />
2) Putting little Johnny in the newspaper takes way too much time. I sit right next to this poor copy editor who laboriously formats calendar entries, obits, etc. to go in the paper for at least 30 hours per week.<br />
There&#8217;s no reason this kind of thing can&#8217;t be automated. Then we free up brain cells for local reporting and good design on stuff that matters and what makes a newspaper company more credible than a community newsletter.<br />
I&#8217;ll be the first to admit that our current strategy is no strategy. But I&#8217;m about to bust a blood vessel from the strain of pulling in the other direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
