<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 2.0 thinking for journalists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonkristufek.com/2008/02/15/web-20-thinking-for-journalists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonkristufek.com/2008/02/15/web-20-thinking-for-journalists/</link>
	<description>Content Strategy, Audience, Media, Ideas and New Business Model for News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 02:39:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nez</title>
		<link>http://jasonkristufek.com/2008/02/15/web-20-thinking-for-journalists/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Nez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wemediaguru.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this. It&#039;s good to have some practical &quot;do this&quot; ideas for those of us trying to put these ideas into play in newsrooms.
Another argument I hear in Bradshaw&#039;s blog is that the focus on technology (video cameras, editing software, etc.) is Web 1.0 thinking as well.
I was looking into a training session put on by Knight and they required editors to promise a $2,000 investment in tech in the next year as part of the application process.
That&#039;s fine, but the techniques they should be teaching are what you&#039;re describing here: blogging, crowd-sourcing, mashups -- living online.
Web 2.0 doesn&#039;t mean a big investment in &quot;stuff&quot;. It means a sea-change in reporter culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this. It&#8217;s good to have some practical &#8220;do this&#8221; ideas for those of us trying to put these ideas into play in newsrooms.<br />
Another argument I hear in Bradshaw&#8217;s blog is that the focus on technology (video cameras, editing software, etc.) is Web 1.0 thinking as well.<br />
I was looking into a training session put on by Knight and they required editors to promise a $2,000 investment in tech in the next year as part of the application process.<br />
That&#8217;s fine, but the techniques they should be teaching are what you&#8217;re describing here: blogging, crowd-sourcing, mashups &#8212; living online.<br />
Web 2.0 doesn&#8217;t mean a big investment in &#8220;stuff&#8221;. It means a sea-change in reporter culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
