<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The case for innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonkristufek.com/2009/08/19/the-case-for-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonkristufek.com/2009/08/19/the-case-for-innovation/</link>
	<description>Media, Innovation, Audience, Ideas and New Business Model for News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:23:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: From the archives: nnovative service concepts in the US Technology review 2005-2007 &#171; Fredzimny&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://jasonkristufek.com/2009/08/19/the-case-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>From the archives: nnovative service concepts in the US Technology review 2005-2007 &#171; Fredzimny&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wemediaguru.com/?p=310#comment-227</guid>
		<description>[...] The case for innovation (wemediaguru.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The case for innovation (wemediaguru.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robpo</title>
		<link>http://jasonkristufek.com/2009/08/19/the-case-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>robpo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wemediaguru.com/?p=310#comment-226</guid>
		<description>When is anything ever &quot;complete&quot; in this new ecosystem?  I think its a bunch of moving parts, some parts work and some don&#039;t.  Parts can be replaced, improved, dumped, added - but the train keeps moving, always moving.  You don&#039;t know til you try, but you better know when you do try.

Transparency is HUGE.

The commenting on GO is pretty healthy for a publication this size, is anything being done with that information?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is anything ever &#8220;complete&#8221; in this new ecosystem?  I think its a bunch of moving parts, some parts work and some don&#8217;t.  Parts can be replaced, improved, dumped, added &#8211; but the train keeps moving, always moving.  You don&#8217;t know til you try, but you better know when you do try.</p>
<p>Transparency is HUGE.</p>
<p>The commenting on GO is pretty healthy for a publication this size, is anything being done with that information?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Hladky</title>
		<link>http://jasonkristufek.com/2009/08/19/the-case-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Hladky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wemediaguru.com/?p=310#comment-225</guid>
		<description>My take on Sarah&#039;s comment is that trying new things in an evolving idea stream, or &quot;moving forward with an incomplete idea&quot;, such as user engagement, revenue generators, etc. is different (and much better) than moving forward with something that&#039;s incomplete (as in making something live that isn&#039;t fully functional). Sarah - am I interpreting you correctly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take on Sarah&#8217;s comment is that trying new things in an evolving idea stream, or &#8220;moving forward with an incomplete idea&#8221;, such as user engagement, revenue generators, etc. is different (and much better) than moving forward with something that&#8217;s incomplete (as in making something live that isn&#8217;t fully functional). Sarah &#8211; am I interpreting you correctly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Altman</title>
		<link>http://jasonkristufek.com/2009/08/19/the-case-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Altman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wemediaguru.com/?p=310#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Moving forward with that methodology is a very comfortable way to go.

But by &quot;Take the parts you do know, and make them great. The rest will form over time and follow.&quot; yo will never grow and continue to do everything you&#039;ve always done.

At some point you have to try something different.  Take a risk.  Try something new.

By being transparent with the audience, telling them this is a test and we need their help...you open yourself up for a collective and collaborative environment.

This is a great conversation - let&#039;s keep it going!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moving forward with that methodology is a very comfortable way to go.</p>
<p>But by &#8220;Take the parts you do know, and make them great. The rest will form over time and follow.&#8221; yo will never grow and continue to do everything you&#8217;ve always done.</p>
<p>At some point you have to try something different.  Take a risk.  Try something new.</p>
<p>By being transparent with the audience, telling them this is a test and we need their help&#8230;you open yourself up for a collective and collaborative environment.</p>
<p>This is a great conversation &#8211; let&#8217;s keep it going!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Gorsh</title>
		<link>http://jasonkristufek.com/2009/08/19/the-case-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Gorsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wemediaguru.com/?p=310#comment-223</guid>
		<description>I love it.  I am all for incomplete ideas, but I want to throw out some additional thoughts on the importance of doing the parts that we do know, and doing them well.

In my opinion, moving forward with an incomplete idea is different that moving forward with something that is incomplete (functionality, capability, etc.).  Take the parts you do know, and make them great.  The rest will form over time and follow.

Also, in my experience, having an idea of the goal/objective you are trying to obtain helps to speed the completion of the incomplete.

Looking forward to the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it.  I am all for incomplete ideas, but I want to throw out some additional thoughts on the importance of doing the parts that we do know, and doing them well.</p>
<p>In my opinion, moving forward with an incomplete idea is different that moving forward with something that is incomplete (functionality, capability, etc.).  Take the parts you do know, and make them great.  The rest will form over time and follow.</p>
<p>Also, in my experience, having an idea of the goal/objective you are trying to obtain helps to speed the completion of the incomplete.</p>
<p>Looking forward to the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Altman</title>
		<link>http://jasonkristufek.com/2009/08/19/the-case-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Altman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wemediaguru.com/?p=310#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Nice post J.

The biggest question I continue to have is how do we loosen the death grip the traditional media teams have on their brand.

We are truly in a position for everyone to prosper by the collective sums of the whole.  Although the amount of control and &quot;ownership&quot; may be less than it was before - the total result will be greater.

Keep up the awesome work Jason, I&#039;ll try to hold up my end of the deal from my side!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post J.</p>
<p>The biggest question I continue to have is how do we loosen the death grip the traditional media teams have on their brand.</p>
<p>We are truly in a position for everyone to prosper by the collective sums of the whole.  Although the amount of control and &#8220;ownership&#8221; may be less than it was before &#8211; the total result will be greater.</p>
<p>Keep up the awesome work Jason, I&#8217;ll try to hold up my end of the deal from my side!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Peters</title>
		<link>http://jasonkristufek.com/2009/08/19/the-case-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wemediaguru.com/?p=310#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Jason -

Those incomplete ideas are such a bother, but they have to be worked through to make progress.  Thanks for highlighting their value.

Chuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason -</p>
<p>Those incomplete ideas are such a bother, but they have to be worked through to make progress.  Thanks for highlighting their value.</p>
<p>Chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
